linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 00/16] x86: Rewrite the retpoline rewrite logic

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAADnVQ+NA2J3Lxvb8Y31yaubM6ntx5LtoSEaLziZ1b8qiY4oYQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 26 Oct 2021 14:05:55 -0700
From:   Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
        Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
        bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/16] x86: Rewrite the retpoline rewrite logic

On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 2:05 PM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 01:00:04PM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 11:45 AM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 11:26:57AM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> > >
> > > > It's a merge conflict. The patchset failed to apply to both bpf and
> > > > bpf-next trees:
> > >
> > > Figures :/ I suspect it relies on tip/objtool/core at the very least and
> > > possibly some of the x86 trees as well.
> > >
> > > I can locally merge tip/master with bpf, but getting a CI to do that
> > > might be tricky.
> >
> > We have an ability in CI to supply few additional patches on top bpf/bpf-next
> > trees, but that's usually done for the cases where we've merged a fix into
> > one tree, but it's needed in both while bpf->net->linus->net-next->bpf-next
> > circle is still pending.
> >
> > Does tip/objtool/core dependency relevant for this set?
> > Can you rebase the current set on top of bpf-next and send it to the list
> > just to get CI to run it? We won't be merging it into bpf-next, of course.
> > I'm mainly interested in seeing all that additional tests passing that
> > we have in bpf-next.
>
> I should be able to rebase it just to that, let me try that in the am
> though, brain is fairly fried atm. Do you really want me to post it to
> the list, or is a git repo good enough?

Please post it. CI cannot pull it from the repo.