[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdYAv5w5AfKPQgCqXgKSYnS7wvCkE3qTj_Q9hyvOS=xsvQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2021 00:10:36 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>
Cc: Basavaraj Natikar <Basavaraj.Natikar@....com>,
Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@....com>,
"open list:PIN CONTROL SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Nehal Shah <Nehal-bakulchandra.Shah@....com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] ACPI: Add stubs for wakeup handler functions
On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 7:13 PM Mario Limonciello
<mario.limonciello@....com> wrote:
> The commit ddfd9dcf270c ("ACPI: PM: Add acpi_[un]register_wakeup_handler()")
> added new functions for drivers to use during the s2idle wakeup path, but
> didn't add stubs for when CONFIG_ACPI wasn't set.
>
> Add those stubs in for other drivers to be able to use.
>
> Fixes: ddfd9dcf270c ("ACPI: PM: Add acpi_[un]register_wakeup_handler()")
> Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>
I need an ACK from an ACPI maintainer to take this with the
other fix into the pinctrl tree.
Alternatively both can be merged into the ACPI tree.
Should these two patches be tagged for stable?
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists