linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH v4 1/2] ACPI: Add stubs for wakeup handler functions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <SA0PR12MB45103B99E6EC91F6AC43979EE2849@SA0PR12MB4510.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Tue, 26 Oct 2021 22:26:48 +0000
From:   "Limonciello, Mario" <Mario.Limonciello@....com>
To:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
CC:     "Natikar, Basavaraj" <Basavaraj.Natikar@....com>,
        "S-k, Shyam-sundar" <Shyam-sundar.S-k@....com>,
        "open list:PIN CONTROL SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Shah, Nehal-bakulchandra" <Nehal-bakulchandra.Shah@....com>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v4 1/2] ACPI: Add stubs for wakeup handler functions

[Public]

> On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 7:13 PM Mario Limonciello
> <mario.limonciello@....com> wrote:
> 
> > The commit ddfd9dcf270c ("ACPI: PM: Add
> acpi_[un]register_wakeup_handler()")
> > added new functions for drivers to use during the s2idle wakeup path, but
> > didn't add stubs for when CONFIG_ACPI wasn't set.
> >
> > Add those stubs in for other drivers to be able to use.
> >
> > Fixes: ddfd9dcf270c ("ACPI: PM: Add acpi_[un]register_wakeup_handler()")
> > Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>
> 
> I need an ACK from an ACPI maintainer to take this with the
> other fix into the pinctrl tree.
> 
> Alternatively both can be merged into the ACPI tree.
> 
> Should these two patches be tagged for stable?
> 

Yes; I think they should be tagged to stable, but only if these come too:

acd47b9f28e55b505aedb842131b40904e151d7c
7e6f8d6f4a42ef9b693ff1b49267c546931d4619