[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YXelB/WhWPqcIl/T@kroah.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2021 08:49:43 +0200
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Xianting Tian <xianting.tian@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>, amit@...nel.org, arnd@...db.de,
osandov@...com, shile.zhang@...ux.alibaba.com,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 2/3] tty: hvc: pass DMA capable memory to put_chars()
On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 02:11:51PM +0800, Xianting Tian wrote:
>
> 在 2021/10/26 下午2:10, Greg KH 写道:
> > On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 02:02:21PM +0800, Xianting Tian wrote:
> > > 在 2021/10/26 下午1:10, Jiri Slaby 写道:
> > > > On 15. 10. 21, 4:46, Xianting Tian wrote:
> > > > > @@ -151,9 +142,11 @@ static uint32_t vtermnos[MAX_NR_HVC_CONSOLES] =
> > > > > static void hvc_console_print(struct console *co, const char *b,
> > > > > unsigned count)
> > > > > {
> > > > > - char c[N_OUTBUF] __ALIGNED__;
> > > > > + char *c;
> > > > > unsigned i = 0, n = 0;
> > > > > int r, donecr = 0, index = co->index;
> > > > > + unsigned long flags;
> > > > > + struct hvc_struct *hp;
> > > > > /* Console access attempt outside of acceptable console
> > > > > range. */
> > > > > if (index >= MAX_NR_HVC_CONSOLES)
> > > > > @@ -163,6 +156,13 @@ static void hvc_console_print(struct console
> > > > > *co, const char *b,
> > > > > if (vtermnos[index] == -1)
> > > > > return;
> > > > > + hp = cons_hvcs[index];
> > > > > + if (!hp)
> > > > > + return;
> > > > You effectively make the console unusable until someone calls
> > > > hvc_alloc() for this device, correct? This doesn't look right. Neither
> > > > you describe this change of behaviour in the commit log.
> > > I mentioned such info in the commit log:
> > > 'Introduce another array(cons_hvcs[]) for hvc pointers next to the
> > > cons_ops[] and vtermnos[] arrays. With the array, we can easily find
> > > hvc's cons_outbuf and its lock.'
> > >
> > > After you pointed it out, I just found what you said make sense, I checked the code hvc_console_print() can support print before hvc_alloc() is called when someone use hvc_instantiate() for an early console discovery method.
> > > I send a patch to fix the issue? or these serial pathches reverted fisrtly then I resend new version patches? thanks
> > Let me revert these now and you can send an updated version.
> OK, thanks.
I have now reverted patches 2/3 and 3/3 in this series from my tree.
The first patch was just fine.
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists