[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b9e56efc-c060-df62-8aec-ad93b0b08764@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2021 22:32:42 +0200
From: Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@...il.com>
To: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: mnhagan88@...il.com, Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@...ke-m.de>,
Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@...il.com>,
"maintainer:BROADCOM BCM5301X ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Jon Mason <jonmason@...adcom.com>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: BCM5301X: Fix I2C controller interrupt
On 27/10/2021 21:37, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> The I2C interrupt controller line is off by 32 because the datasheet
> describes interrupt inputs into the GIC which are for Shared Peripheral
> Interrupts and are starting at offset 32. The ARM GIC binding expects
> the SPI interrupts to be numbered from 0 relative to the SPI base.
>
> Fixes: bb097e3e0045 ("ARM: dts: BCM5301X: Add I2C support to the DT")
> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Thank you! This fixed the MR32 iproc-i2c issue.
It's working now (will post the patch for the MR32 tomorrow):
# cat /proc/interrupts
CPU0 CPU1
24: 1 0 GIC-0 27 Edge gt
25: 110418 108252 GIC-0 29 Edge twd
26: 476 0 GIC-0 117 Level gpio, ttyS0
31: 128 0 GIC-0 121 Level 18009000.i2c <--- YES!
32: 49477 0 GIC-0 100 Level brcmnand
33: 0 0 GIC-0 109 Level mspi_done
34: 0 0 GIC-0 110 Level mspi_halted
35: 0 0 GIC-0 104 Level spi_lr_fullness_reached
36: 0 0 GIC-0 105 Level spi_lr_session_aborted
37: 0 0 GIC-0 106 Level spi_lr_impatient
38: 0 0 GIC-0 107 Level spi_lr_session_done
40: 7227 0 GIC-0 179 Level eth2
51: 0 0 BCMA-GPIO 21 Edge keys
and the attached AT24 + PoE-Power monitor can be probed + read as before.
[ 12.042576] at24 0-0050: 8192 byte 24c64 EEPROM, read-only
...
[ 12.077671] ina2xx 0-0045: power monitor ina219 (Rshunt = 60000 uOhm)
Tested-by: Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@...il.com>
Regards
Christian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists