[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1635318110-1905-1-git-send-email-huangzhaoyang@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2021 15:01:50 +0800
From: Huangzhaoyang <huangzhaoyang@...il.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@...il.com>,
Zhaoyang Huang <zhaoyang.huang@...soc.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH] mm: have kswapd only reclaiming use min protection on memcg
From: Zhaoyang Huang <zhaoyang.huang@...soc.com>
For the kswapd only reclaiming, there is no chance to try again on
this group while direct reclaim has. fix it by judging gfp flag.
Signed-off-by: Zhaoyang Huang <zhaoyang.huang@...soc.com>
---
mm/vmscan.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 74296c2..41f5776 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -2704,7 +2704,8 @@ static void get_scan_count(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc,
unsigned long protection;
/* memory.low scaling, make sure we retry before OOM */
- if (!sc->memcg_low_reclaim && low > min) {
+ if (!sc->memcg_low_reclaim && low > min
+ && sc->gfp_mask & __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM) {
protection = low;
sc->memcg_low_skipped = 1;
} else {
--
1.9.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists