[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdUjsVRwB0_TH5HD8CrPsM15K1RLatP_ABODMe2bQ4C2ow@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2021 09:17:39 +0200
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...il.com>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
MTD Maling List <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-spi <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>,
Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>,
Chris Brandt <Chris.Brandt@...esas.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/7] memory: renesas-rpc-if: Return error in case
devm_ioremap_resource() fails
Hi Prabhakar,
CC seebe
On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 10:57 PM Lad Prabhakar
<prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com> wrote:
> Make sure we return error in case devm_ioremap_resource() fails for dirmap
> resource.
>
> Fixes: ca7d8b980b67 ("memory: add Renesas RPC-IF driver")
> Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
> Reviewed-by: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>
> Reviewed-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>
Thanks for your patch!
> --- a/drivers/memory/renesas-rpc-if.c
> +++ b/drivers/memory/renesas-rpc-if.c
> @@ -243,7 +243,7 @@ int rpcif_sw_init(struct rpcif *rpc, struct device *dev)
> res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "dirmap");
> rpc->dirmap = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, res);
> if (IS_ERR(rpc->dirmap))
> - rpc->dirmap = NULL;
> + return PTR_ERR(rpc->dirmap);
IIRC, it was intentional to make the dirmap optional (because the
device can be used without and/or because some variants on other SoCs
lack it?). Unfortunately this is not reflected in the DT bindings
(yet?). All code using the dirmap does check if rpc->dirmap is
valid first.
> rpc->size = resource_size(res);
>
> rpc->rstc = devm_reset_control_get_exclusive(&pdev->dev, NULL);
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
Powered by blists - more mailing lists