[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdX4HfLUfDk2eZkBugP_ysL3w+qvZqKSR3e47HG4RTggXw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2021 09:21:24 +0200
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...il.com>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
MTD Maling List <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-spi <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>,
Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>,
Chris Brandt <Chris.Brandt@...esas.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/7] memory: renesas-rpc-if: Return error in case
devm_ioremap_resource() fails
On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 9:17 AM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 10:57 PM Lad Prabhakar
> <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com> wrote:
> > Make sure we return error in case devm_ioremap_resource() fails for dirmap
> > resource.
> >
> > Fixes: ca7d8b980b67 ("memory: add Renesas RPC-IF driver")
> > Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>
>
> Thanks for your patch!
>
> > --- a/drivers/memory/renesas-rpc-if.c
> > +++ b/drivers/memory/renesas-rpc-if.c
> > @@ -243,7 +243,7 @@ int rpcif_sw_init(struct rpcif *rpc, struct device *dev)
> > res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "dirmap");
> > rpc->dirmap = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, res);
> > if (IS_ERR(rpc->dirmap))
> > - rpc->dirmap = NULL;
> > + return PTR_ERR(rpc->dirmap);
>
> IIRC, it was intentional to make the dirmap optional (because the
> device can be used without and/or because some variants on other SoCs
> lack it?). Unfortunately this is not reflected in the DT bindings
> (yet?). All code using the dirmap does check if rpc->dirmap is
> valid first.
>
> > rpc->size = resource_size(res);
Of course this will crash if the dirmap is not present, so for now it's better
to just bail out.
Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
> >
> > rpc->rstc = devm_reset_control_get_exclusive(&pdev->dev, NULL);
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
Powered by blists - more mailing lists