[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3fac8ddb626205286f79adde96ea527b@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2021 08:46:44 +0100
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
To: Qian Cai <quic_qiancai@...cinc.com>
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@....com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: arm64: Remove unused TRNG_NO_ENTROPY
On 2021-10-26 22:09, Qian Cai wrote:
> TRNG_NO_ENTROPY was unused when introduced and now. This is also caught
> by
> GCC (W=2):
>
> arch/arm64/kvm/trng.c:17: warning: macro "TRNG_NO_ENTROPY" is not used
> [-Wunused-macros]
> 17 | #define TRNG_NO_ENTROPY ((unsigned long)-3)
>
> Signed-off-by: Qian Cai <quic_qiancai@...cinc.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kvm/trng.c | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/trng.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/trng.c
> index 99bdd7103c9c..6a46b3ac3970 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/trng.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/trng.c
> @@ -14,7 +14,6 @@
> #define TRNG_SUCCESS 0UL
> #define TRNG_NOT_SUPPORTED ((unsigned long)-1)
> #define TRNG_INVALID_PARAMETER ((unsigned long)-2)
> -#define TRNG_NO_ENTROPY ((unsigned long)-3)
>
> #define TRNG_MAX_BITS64 192
That's an architectural definition that doesn't cause any problem.
If anything, that's documentation.
We have *tons* of other definitions with no user all over the
arm64 code. They save the exact same purpose.
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists