[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <163529798547.15791.16388896984607981120@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2021 18:26:25 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
To: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com>,
alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com, ludovic.desroches@...rochip.com,
mturquette@...libre.com, nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com
Cc: linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 15/15] clk: use clk_core_get_rate_recalc() in clk_rate_get()
Quoting Claudiu Beznea (2021-10-11 04:27:19)
> In case clock flags contains CLK_GET_RATE_NOCACHE the clk_rate_get()
> will return the cached rate. Thus, use clk_core_get_rate_recalc() which
> takes proper action when clock flags contains CLK_GET_RATE_NOCACHE.
>
> Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com>
> ---
> drivers/clk/clk.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c
> index 65508eb89ec9..64838754cdef 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
> @@ -3108,7 +3108,7 @@ static int clk_rate_get(void *data, u64 *val)
> {
> struct clk_core *core = data;
>
> - *val = core->rate;
> + *val = clk_core_get_rate_recalc(core);
We need to grab the prepare lock now. I'll fix it when applying.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists