[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YXmEo8iMNIn1esYC@zn.tnic>
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2021 18:56:19 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>
Cc: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
linux-efi <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>,
platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@...radead.org>,
Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>,
"# 3.4.x" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86/sme: Explicitly map new EFI memmap table as
encrypted
On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 05:14:35PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> I could take it, but since it will ultimately go through -tip anyway,
> perhaps better if they just take it directly? (This will change after
> the next -rc1 though)
>
> Boris?
Yeah, I'm being told this is not urgent enough to rush in now so you
could queue it into your fixes branch for 5.16 once -rc1 is out and send
it to Linus then. The stable tag is just so it gets backported to the
respective trees.
But if you prefer I should take it, then I can queue it after -rc1.
It'll boil down to the same thing though.
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists