linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] x86/sme: Explicitly map new EFI memmap table as encrypted

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMj1kXEZkw99MPssHWFRL_k0okeGF47VYL+o8p72hBWkqW927g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 27 Oct 2021 18:59:15 +0200
From:   Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>
To:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc:     Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
        linux-efi <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>,
        platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy@...radead.org>,
        Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>,
        "# 3.4.x" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86/sme: Explicitly map new EFI memmap table as encrypted

On Wed, 27 Oct 2021 at 18:56, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 05:14:35PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > I could take it, but since it will ultimately go through -tip anyway,
> > perhaps better if they just take it directly? (This will change after
> > the next -rc1 though)
> >
> > Boris?
>
> Yeah, I'm being told this is not urgent enough to rush in now so you
> could queue it into your fixes branch for 5.16 once -rc1 is out and send
> it to Linus then. The stable tag is just so it gets backported to the
> respective trees.
>
> But if you prefer I should take it, then I can queue it after -rc1.
> It'll boil down to the same thing though.
>

No, in that case, I can take it myself.

Tom, does that work for you?