linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RESEND] ASoC: fix unmet dependencies on GPIOLIB for SND_SOC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <163542594951.950250.6416745784322716952.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date:   Thu, 28 Oct 2021 13:59:09 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Vijendar.Mukunda@....com, perex@...ex.cz,
        pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com, tiwai@...e.com,
        Julian Braha <julianbraha@...il.com>
Cc:     alsa-devel@...a-project.org, fazilyildiran@...il.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] ASoC: fix unmet dependencies on GPIOLIB for SND_SOC_DMIC

On Wed, 27 Oct 2021 14:48:35 -0400, Julian Braha wrote:
> When SND_SOC_AMD_RENOIR_MACH or SND_SOC_AMD_RV_RT5682_MACH
> are selected, and GPIOLIB is not selected, Kbuild gives
> the following warnings, respectively:
> 
> WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for SND_SOC_DMIC
>   Depends on [n]: SOUND [=y] && !UML && SND [=y] && SND_SOC [=y] && GPIOLIB [=n]
>   Selected by [y]:
>   - SND_SOC_AMD_RENOIR_MACH [=y] && SOUND [=y] && !UML && SND [=y] && SND_SOC [=y] && SND_SOC_AMD_RENOIR [=y]
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] ASoC: fix unmet dependencies on GPIOLIB for SND_SOC_DMIC
      commit: 5c7dee4407dcd3522a133acdd90d64bf41d00986

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark