linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] arm64: Kconfig: Enable MCT timer for ARCH

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e01b0072-008a-c83d-59b2-2174860c00fd@canonical.com>
Date:   Thu, 28 Oct 2021 16:35:15 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>
To:     Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@...aro.org>,
        Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
Cc:     linux-arm Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Samsung SOC <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: Kconfig: Enable MCT timer for ARCH_EXYNOS

On 28/10/2021 16:22, Sam Protsenko wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Oct 2021 at 17:03, Krzysztof Kozlowski
> <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 26/10/2021 13:59, Sam Protsenko wrote:
>>> Some ARM64 Exynos SoCs have MCT timer block, e.g. Exynos850 and
>>> Exynos5433. CLKSRC_EXYNOS_MCT option is not visible unless COMPILE_TEST
>>> is enabled. Select CLKSRC_EXYNOS_MCT option for ARM64 ARCH_EXYNOS like
>>> it's done in arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig, to enable MCT timer support
>>> for ARM64 Exynos SoCs.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@...aro.org>
>>> ---
>>>  arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms | 1 +
>>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>
>>
>> +CC Marek, Marc, Mark and Chanwoo,
>> Looks like duplicated:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20181018095708.1527-7-m.szyprowski@samsung.com/
>>
>> The topic stalled and I think this particular patch did not make sense
>> on its own, without rest of changes from Marek. I am not sure, though...
>>
> 
> Krzysztof, Marek,
> 
> That series looks nice, I'm quite interested in that being applied. Do
> you think I can do something to help with that (e.g. rebasing,
> re-sending on behalf of Marek, testing on Exynos850, etc)?

I think there were no objections against v4 of this patchset, but
somehow it wasn't applied.

Marek,
Does it make sense to try respinning your v4?

Best regards,
Krzysztof