linux-kernel - Re: [Outreachy kernel] [PATCH 5/7] staging: vt6655: Rewrite conditional in AL7320 initialization

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6d2590b127499ba7ae1e7bc36d71064a5262659d.camel@gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 28 Oct 2021 15:35:30 +0100
From:   Karolina Drobnik <karolinadrobnik@...il.com>
To:     Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...ia.fr>,
        "Fabio M. De Francesco" <fmdefrancesco@...il.com>
Cc:     outreachy-kernel@...glegroups.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
        forest@...ttletooquiet.net, linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Outreachy kernel] [PATCH 5/7] staging: vt6655: Rewrite
 conditional in AL7320 initialization

On Thu, 2021-10-28 at 14:36 +0200, Fabio M. De Francesco wrote:
> As far as I know by reading some Greg K-H's replies to other
> developers, this 
> "<test> ? <true> : <false>" style is not well accepted here.

I thought that the expression is simple enough that it can be written
this way. Julia nicely summarised why I think it's a good usage of the
conditional operator. Still, there's no problem in changing it to "if-
else" statement if that's the preferred option.


Thanks,
Karolina
>