[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.22.394.2110281639360.9518@hadrien>
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2021 16:40:35 +0200 (CEST)
From: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...ia.fr>
To: Karolina Drobnik <karolinadrobnik@...il.com>
cc: "Fabio M. De Francesco" <fmdefrancesco@...il.com>,
outreachy-kernel@...glegroups.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
forest@...ttletooquiet.net, linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Outreachy kernel] [PATCH 4/7] staging: vt6655: Introduce `data`
temporary variable
> On Thu, 2021-10-28 at 13:32 +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > Would it be better as data[i] ?
> >
> > Could there be a better name than "data"? Perhaps "table"?
>
> Hmm, now when I'm thinking about, it indeed looks like a better option.
> I would even say that `data` (or `table`/`init_table`) can be only used
> in the AL7320 case and we can go with `al2230_init_table` for AL2230.
> The line would be 61 characters long, way below the limit.
>
> What do you think?
That would amount to dropping patch 4? That seems fine. It is better to
avoid creating aliases.
julia
Powered by blists - more mailing lists