[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <27e1ba98-80ef-aa89-1527-b50a9ea33436@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2021 01:21:27 +0300
From: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Julian Braha <julianbraha@...il.com>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
"open list:TEGRA ARCHITECTURE SUPPORT" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
fazilyildiran@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] soc/tegra: fix unmet dependency on DMADEVICES for
TEGRA20_APB_DMA
30.10.2021 01:07, Arnd Bergmann пишет:
> On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 10:59 PM Julian Braha <julianbraha@...il.com> wrote:
>>
>> drivers/soc/tegra/Kconfig | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/soc/tegra/Kconfig b/drivers/soc/tegra/Kconfig
>> index 8b53ed1cc67e..ee7f631933c2 100644
>> --- a/drivers/soc/tegra/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/soc/tegra/Kconfig
>> @@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ config SOC_TEGRA_FUSE
>> def_bool y
>> depends on ARCH_TEGRA
>> select SOC_BUS
>> - select TEGRA20_APB_DMA if ARCH_TEGRA_2x_SOC
>> + select TEGRA20_APB_DMA if DMADEVICES && ARCH_TEGRA_2x_SOC
>>
>
> Is this actually a compile-time dependency? If the fuse driver merely
> uses DMA and assumes that the TEGRA20_APB_DMA driver is the one
> providing this functionality, the 'select' should be removed here.
There was a patch that did it already [1], not sure what happened to it.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20200923003421.4561-1-digetx@gmail.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists