[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a2Q65mw+sXm977sxk6XWfAnhe9HQyVC62n8Hd-PERr_TA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2021 00:07:30 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Julian Braha <julianbraha@...il.com>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
"open list:TEGRA ARCHITECTURE SUPPORT" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
fazilyildiran@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] soc/tegra: fix unmet dependency on DMADEVICES for TEGRA20_APB_DMA
On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 10:59 PM Julian Braha <julianbraha@...il.com> wrote:
>
> drivers/soc/tegra/Kconfig | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/tegra/Kconfig b/drivers/soc/tegra/Kconfig
> index 8b53ed1cc67e..ee7f631933c2 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/tegra/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/soc/tegra/Kconfig
> @@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ config SOC_TEGRA_FUSE
> def_bool y
> depends on ARCH_TEGRA
> select SOC_BUS
> - select TEGRA20_APB_DMA if ARCH_TEGRA_2x_SOC
> + select TEGRA20_APB_DMA if DMADEVICES && ARCH_TEGRA_2x_SOC
>
Is this actually a compile-time dependency? If the fuse driver merely
uses DMA and assumes that the TEGRA20_APB_DMA driver is the one
providing this functionality, the 'select' should be removed here.
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists