lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 29 Oct 2021 16:16:03 +0530
From:   <pillair@...eaurora.org>
To:     "'Stephen Boyd'" <swboyd@...omium.org>, <agross@...nel.org>,
        <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>, <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
        <ohad@...ery.com>, <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Cc:     <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <sibis@...eaurora.org>,
        <mpubbise@...eaurora.org>, <kuabhs@...omium.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v7 2/3] dt-bindings: remoteproc: qcom: Add SC7280 WPSS support



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
> Sent: Friday, October 29, 2021 3:38 AM
> To: Rakesh Pillai <pillair@...eaurora.org>; agross@...nel.org;
> bjorn.andersson@...aro.org; mathieu.poirier@...aro.org; ohad@...ery.com;
> p.zabel@...gutronix.de; robh+dt@...nel.org
> Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org; linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org;
> devicetree@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org;
> sibis@...eaurora.org; mpubbise@...eaurora.org; kuabhs@...omium.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/3] dt-bindings: remoteproc: qcom: Add SC7280
> WPSS support
>
> > +
> > +        glink-edge {
> > +            interrupts-extended = <&ipcc IPCC_CLIENT_WPSS
> > +                                         IPCC_MPROC_SIGNAL_GLINK_QMP
> > +                                         IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
> > +            mboxes = <&ipcc IPCC_CLIENT_WPSS
> > +                            IPCC_MPROC_SIGNAL_GLINK_QMP>;
> > +
> > +            label = "wpss";
> > +            qcom,remote-pid = <13>;
> 
> There are a few properties here that don't seem to be required. Is that
> intentional?

Hi Stephen,
All the properties in the example are listed as required (except for status, which will be removed in the subsequent patchset).
Do you mean the glink-edge node properties ?

Thanks,
Rakesh Pillai.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ