[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAE-0n5155J4vvvFES9V5=v+nX3BhZsBgZxkB=uLQOPij=-sf-Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2021 14:04:04 -0500
From: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
To: agross@...nel.org, bjorn.andersson@...aro.org,
mathieu.poirier@...aro.org, ohad@...ery.com,
p.zabel@...gutronix.de, pillair@...eaurora.org, robh+dt@...nel.org
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
sibis@...eaurora.org, mpubbise@...eaurora.org, kuabhs@...omium.org
Subject: RE: [PATCH v7 2/3] dt-bindings: remoteproc: qcom: Add SC7280 WPSS support
Quoting pillair@...eaurora.org (2021-10-29 03:46:03)
>
> > > +
> > > + glink-edge {
> > > + interrupts-extended = <&ipcc IPCC_CLIENT_WPSS
> > > + IPCC_MPROC_SIGNAL_GLINK_QMP
> > > + IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
> > > + mboxes = <&ipcc IPCC_CLIENT_WPSS
> > > + IPCC_MPROC_SIGNAL_GLINK_QMP>;
> > > +
> > > + label = "wpss";
> > > + qcom,remote-pid = <13>;
> >
> > There are a few properties here that don't seem to be required. Is that
> > intentional?
>
> Hi Stephen,
> All the properties in the example are listed as required (except for status, which will be removed in the subsequent patchset).
> Do you mean the glink-edge node properties ?
Yes I mean all the properties in the glink-edge node. Are they required?
If so then we need to list them in the schema.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists