[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAH7FV3md_SBTHu9sTp-hLtLd0ERBdXx8HzM=W9hF79X5V=twQA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2021 08:20:50 -0300
From: Maíra Canal <maira.canal@....br>
To: Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Cc: Sean Young <sean@...s.org>, mchehab@...nel.org,
thierry.reding@...il.com, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, kernel@...gutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] media: ir-rx51: Switch to atomic PWM API
Hello Uwe,
> Doing this here introduces a change in behaviour. Better do this after
> pwm_get().
I didn't really get this feedback. Isn't pwm_init_state after pwm_get?
Or should it be before the error treatment of pwm_get?
> Conceptually this last hunk belongs in a separate patch. And you don't
> need to repeat PTR_ERR(pwm), as dev_err_probe already emits this
> information. So
>
> return dev_err_probe(&dev->dev, PTR_ERR(pwm), "pwm_get failed\n");
>
> should be fine.
Thank you for the suggestion! I will fix it on v2.
Maíra
Powered by blists - more mailing lists