[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <00000000000030c35005cfa98ed5@google.com>
Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2021 10:40:25 -0700
From: syzbot <syzbot+e4f5deeeccdd5a4873fe@...kaller.appspotmail.com>
To: asml.silence@...il.com, axboe@...nel.dk, fweisbec@...il.com,
io-uring@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mingo@...nel.org, syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, xiaoguang.wang@...ux.alibaba.com
Subject: [syzbot] INFO: rcu detected stall in tctx_task_work
Hello,
syzbot found the following issue on:
HEAD commit: bdcc9f6a5682 Add linux-next specific files for 20211029
git tree: linux-next
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=10be38f4b00000
kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=4b504bcb4c507265
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=e4f5deeeccdd5a4873fe
compiler: gcc (Debian 10.2.1-6) 10.2.1 20210110, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.35.2
syz repro: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.syz?x=10b915d4b00000
C reproducer: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.c?x=1395f3e2b00000
The issue was bisected to:
commit 34ced75ca1f63fac6148497971212583aa0f7a87
Author: Xiaoguang Wang <xiaoguang.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>
Date: Mon Oct 25 05:38:48 2021 +0000
io_uring: reduce frequent add_wait_queue() overhead for multi-shot poll request
bisection log: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/bisect.txt?x=13f4a9d4b00000
final oops: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/report.txt?x=100ca9d4b00000
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=17f4a9d4b00000
IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+e4f5deeeccdd5a4873fe@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Fixes: 34ced75ca1f6 ("io_uring: reduce frequent add_wait_queue() overhead for multi-shot poll request")
rcu: INFO: rcu_preempt self-detected stall on CPU
rcu: 0-....: (10499 ticks this GP) idle=91d/1/0x4000000000000000 softirq=9714/9714 fqs=3884
(t=10500 jiffies g=11093 q=47)
NMI backtrace for cpu 0
CPU: 0 PID: 6487 Comm: syz-executor141 Not tainted 5.15.0-rc7-next-20211029-syzkaller #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011
Call Trace:
<IRQ>
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
dump_stack_lvl+0xcd/0x134 lib/dump_stack.c:106
nmi_cpu_backtrace.cold+0x47/0x144 lib/nmi_backtrace.c:105
nmi_trigger_cpumask_backtrace+0x1ae/0x220 lib/nmi_backtrace.c:62
trigger_single_cpu_backtrace include/linux/nmi.h:164 [inline]
rcu_dump_cpu_stacks+0x25e/0x3f0 kernel/rcu/tree_stall.h:343
print_cpu_stall kernel/rcu/tree_stall.h:604 [inline]
check_cpu_stall kernel/rcu/tree_stall.h:688 [inline]
rcu_pending kernel/rcu/tree.c:3922 [inline]
rcu_sched_clock_irq.cold+0x9d/0x746 kernel/rcu/tree.c:2620
update_process_times+0x16d/0x200 kernel/time/timer.c:1785
tick_sched_handle+0x9b/0x180 kernel/time/tick-sched.c:226
tick_sched_timer+0x1b0/0x2d0 kernel/time/tick-sched.c:1428
__run_hrtimer kernel/time/hrtimer.c:1685 [inline]
__hrtimer_run_queues+0x1c0/0xe50 kernel/time/hrtimer.c:1749
hrtimer_interrupt+0x31c/0x790 kernel/time/hrtimer.c:1811
local_apic_timer_interrupt arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c:1086 [inline]
__sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x146/0x530 arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c:1103
sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x8e/0xc0 arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c:1097
</IRQ>
<TASK>
asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x12/0x20 arch/x86/include/asm/idtentry.h:638
RIP: 0010:debug_spin_unlock kernel/locking/spinlock_debug.c:104 [inline]
RIP: 0010:do_raw_spin_unlock+0x101/0x230 kernel/locking/spinlock_debug.c:140
Code: 8e fc 00 00 00 65 8b 05 e5 c5 a4 7e 39 45 08 0f 85 b5 00 00 00 48 b8 00 00 00 00 00 fc ff df 4c 89 ea 48 c1 ea 03 80 3c 02 00 <0f> 85 f5 00 00 00 4c 89 e2 48 c7 45 10 ff ff ff ff 48 b8 00 00 00
RSP: 0018:ffffc90002a8fcc8 EFLAGS: 00000246
RAX: dffffc0000000000 RBX: ffff88801a315950 RCX: ffffffff815d4f10
RDX: 1ffff1100449ce7a RSI: 0000000000000004 RDI: ffff8880224e73c0
RBP: ffff8880224e73c0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffff8880224e73c3
R10: ffffed100449ce78 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff8880224e73c8
R13: ffff8880224e73d0 R14: ffff88801a315918 R15: ffff88801a3158c0
__raw_spin_unlock include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:151 [inline]
_raw_spin_unlock+0x1a/0x40 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:186
tctx_task_work+0x1b3/0x630 fs/io_uring.c:2207
task_work_run+0xdd/0x1a0 kernel/task_work.c:164
exit_task_work include/linux/task_work.h:32 [inline]
do_exit+0xc14/0x2b40 kernel/exit.c:832
do_group_exit+0x125/0x310 kernel/exit.c:929
__do_sys_exit_group kernel/exit.c:940 [inline]
__se_sys_exit_group kernel/exit.c:938 [inline]
__x64_sys_exit_group+0x3a/0x50 kernel/exit.c:938
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
RIP: 0033:0x7fe6950481a9
Code: Unable to access opcode bytes at RIP 0x7fe69504817f.
RSP: 002b:00007ffc42a91cb8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000e7
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007fe6950bc330 RCX: 00007fe6950481a9
RDX: 000000000000003c RSI: 00000000000000e7 RDI: 0000000000000000
RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: ffffffffffffffc0 R09: 00000000f5ffffff
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007fe6950bc330
R13: 0000000000000001 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000001
</TASK>
----------------
Code disassembly (best guess):
0: 8e fc mov %esp,%?
2: 00 00 add %al,(%rax)
4: 00 65 8b add %ah,-0x75(%rbp)
7: 05 e5 c5 a4 7e add $0x7ea4c5e5,%eax
c: 39 45 08 cmp %eax,0x8(%rbp)
f: 0f 85 b5 00 00 00 jne 0xca
15: 48 b8 00 00 00 00 00 movabs $0xdffffc0000000000,%rax
1c: fc ff df
1f: 4c 89 ea mov %r13,%rdx
22: 48 c1 ea 03 shr $0x3,%rdx
26: 80 3c 02 00 cmpb $0x0,(%rdx,%rax,1)
* 2a: 0f 85 f5 00 00 00 jne 0x125 <-- trapping instruction
30: 4c 89 e2 mov %r12,%rdx
33: 48 c7 45 10 ff ff ff movq $0xffffffffffffffff,0x10(%rbp)
3a: ff
3b: 48 rex.W
3c: b8 .byte 0xb8
3d: 00 00 add %al,(%rax)
---
This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot.
syzbot engineers can be reached at syzkaller@...glegroups.com.
syzbot will keep track of this issue. See:
https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot.
For information about bisection process see: https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#bisection
syzbot can test patches for this issue, for details see:
https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#testing-patches
Powered by blists - more mailing lists