[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YX7VA1JZaYkTQeSi@arighi-desktop>
Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2021 18:40:19 +0100
From: Andrea Righi <andrea.righi@...onical.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] signal: Add SA_IMMUTABLE to ensure forced siganls do not
get changed
On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 10:09:04AM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>
> As Andy pointed out that there are races between
> force_sig_info_to_task and sigaction[1] when force_sig_info_task. As
> Kees discovered[2] ptrace is also able to change these signals.
>
> In the case of seeccomp killing a process with a signal it is a
> security violation to allow the signal to be caught or manipulated.
>
> Solve this problem by introducing a new flag SA_IMMUTABLE that
> prevents sigaction and ptrace from modifying these forced signals.
> This flag is carefully made kernel internal so that no new ABI is
> introduced.
>
> Longer term I think this can be solved by guaranteeing short circuit
> delivery of signals in this case. Unfortunately reliable and
> guaranteed short circuit delivery of these signals is still a ways off
> from being implemented, tested, and merged. So I have implemented a much
> simpler alternative for now.
>
> [1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/b5d52d25-7bde-4030-a7b1-7c6f8ab90660@www.fastmail.com
> [2] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/202110281136.5CE65399A7@keescook
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> Fixes: 307d522f5eb8 ("signal/seccomp: Refactor seccomp signal and coredump generation")
> Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
> ---
FWIW I've tested this patch and I confirm that it fixes the failure that
I reported with the seccomp_bpf selftest.
Tested-by: Andrea Righi <andrea.righi@...onical.com>
Thanks!
-Andrea
>
> I have tested this patch and this changed works for me to fix the issue.
>
> I believe this closes all of the races that force_sig_info_to_task
> has when sigdfl is specified. So this should be enough for anything
> that needs a guaranteed that userspace can not race with the kernel
> is handled.
>
> Can folks look this over and see if I missed something?
> Thank you,
> Eric
>
>
> include/linux/signal_types.h | 3 +++
> include/uapi/asm-generic/signal-defs.h | 1 +
> kernel/signal.c | 8 +++++++-
> 3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/signal_types.h b/include/linux/signal_types.h
> index 34cb28b8f16c..927f7c0e5bff 100644
> --- a/include/linux/signal_types.h
> +++ b/include/linux/signal_types.h
> @@ -70,6 +70,9 @@ struct ksignal {
> int sig;
> };
>
> +/* Used to kill the race between sigaction and forced signals */
> +#define SA_IMMUTABLE 0x008000000
> +
> #ifndef __ARCH_UAPI_SA_FLAGS
> #ifdef SA_RESTORER
> #define __ARCH_UAPI_SA_FLAGS SA_RESTORER
> diff --git a/include/uapi/asm-generic/signal-defs.h b/include/uapi/asm-generic/signal-defs.h
> index fe929e7b77ca..7572f2f46ee8 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/asm-generic/signal-defs.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/asm-generic/signal-defs.h
> @@ -45,6 +45,7 @@
> #define SA_UNSUPPORTED 0x00000400
> #define SA_EXPOSE_TAGBITS 0x00000800
> /* 0x00010000 used on mips */
> +/* 0x00800000 used for internal SA_IMMUTABLE */
> /* 0x01000000 used on x86 */
> /* 0x02000000 used on x86 */
> /*
> diff --git a/kernel/signal.c b/kernel/signal.c
> index 6a5e1802b9a2..056a107e3cbc 100644
> --- a/kernel/signal.c
> +++ b/kernel/signal.c
> @@ -1336,6 +1336,7 @@ force_sig_info_to_task(struct kernel_siginfo *info, struct task_struct *t, bool
> blocked = sigismember(&t->blocked, sig);
> if (blocked || ignored || sigdfl) {
> action->sa.sa_handler = SIG_DFL;
> + action->sa.sa_flags |= SA_IMMUTABLE;
> if (blocked) {
> sigdelset(&t->blocked, sig);
> recalc_sigpending_and_wake(t);
> @@ -2760,7 +2761,8 @@ bool get_signal(struct ksignal *ksig)
> if (!signr)
> break; /* will return 0 */
>
> - if (unlikely(current->ptrace) && signr != SIGKILL) {
> + if (unlikely(current->ptrace) && (signr != SIGKILL) &&
> + !(sighand->action[signr -1].sa.sa_flags & SA_IMMUTABLE)) {
> signr = ptrace_signal(signr, &ksig->info);
> if (!signr)
> continue;
> @@ -4110,6 +4112,10 @@ int do_sigaction(int sig, struct k_sigaction *act, struct k_sigaction *oact)
> k = &p->sighand->action[sig-1];
>
> spin_lock_irq(&p->sighand->siglock);
> + if (k->sa.sa_flags & SA_IMMUTABLE) {
> + spin_unlock_irq(&p->sighand->siglock);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> if (oact)
> *oact = *k;
>
> --
> 2.20.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists