[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87pmrjkfs9.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2021 17:21:42 +0100
From: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
To: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK"
<linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
"open list:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Bandan Das <bsd@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Wei Huang <wei.huang2@....com>,
"maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" <x86@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] KVM: x86: SVM: add module param to control LBR
virtualization
Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com> writes:
> This is useful for debug and also makes it consistent with
> the rest of the SVM optional features.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
> index 21bb81710e0f6..2b5f8e10d686d 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
> @@ -186,12 +186,13 @@ module_param(vls, int, 0444);
> static int vgif = true;
> module_param(vgif, int, 0444);
>
> +static int tsc_scaling = true;
> +module_param(tsc_scaling, int, 0444);
> +
> /* enable/disable LBR virtualization */
> static int lbrv = true;
> module_param(lbrv, int, 0444);
>
> -static int tsc_scaling = true;
> -module_param(tsc_scaling, int, 0444);
Subject line says "KVM: x86: SVM: add module param to control LBR
virtualization" but the patch just moves 'tsc_scaling' param a couple
lines up. Was this intended or is this a rebase artifact and the patch
just needs to be dropped?
>
> /*
> * enable / disable AVIC. Because the defaults differ for APICv
--
Vitaly
Powered by blists - more mailing lists