[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <435a0473c5b42ef3e7c332e386af13f7e8d67c6a.camel@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2021 18:26:57 +0200
From: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>
To: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK"
<linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
"open list:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Bandan Das <bsd@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Wei Huang <wei.huang2@....com>,
"maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" <x86@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] KVM: x86: SVM: add module param to control LBR
virtualization
On Mon, 2021-11-01 at 17:21 +0100, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com> writes:
>
> > This is useful for debug and also makes it consistent with
> > the rest of the SVM optional features.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>
> > ---
> > arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c | 5 +++--
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
> > index 21bb81710e0f6..2b5f8e10d686d 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
> > @@ -186,12 +186,13 @@ module_param(vls, int, 0444);
> > static int vgif = true;
> > module_param(vgif, int, 0444);
> >
> > +static int tsc_scaling = true;
> > +module_param(tsc_scaling, int, 0444);
> > +
> > /* enable/disable LBR virtualization */
> > static int lbrv = true;
> > module_param(lbrv, int, 0444);
> >
> > -static int tsc_scaling = true;
> > -module_param(tsc_scaling, int, 0444);
>
> Subject line says "KVM: x86: SVM: add module param to control LBR
> virtualization" but the patch just moves 'tsc_scaling' param a couple
> lines up. Was this intended or is this a rebase artifact and the patch
> just needs to be dropped?
Yes, I didn't notice when I rebased the series last time, that this patch was accepted
already.
Sorry for the noise.
Best regards,
Maxim Levitsky
>
> >
> > /*
> > * enable / disable AVIC. Because the defaults differ for APICv
Powered by blists - more mailing lists