[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c1610093-95ae-68d3-57ae-93b1bc9715d7@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2021 19:25:52 -0400
From: Jesse Taube <mr.bossman075@...il.com>
To: Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
Cc: NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Dong Aisheng <aisheng.dong@....com>,
Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
soc@...nel.org, Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@....com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
Giulio Benetti <giulio.benetti@...ettiengineering.com>,
Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <nobuhiro1.iwamatsu@...hiba.co.jp>,
linux-clk <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mmc <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-serial@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 11/13] mmc: sdhci-esdhc-imx: Add sdhc support for
i.MXRT series
On 11/2/21 19:17, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 7:57 PM Jesse Taube <mr.bossman075@...il.com> wrote:
>
>> static struct esdhc_soc_data usdhc_imx8qxp_data = {
>> .flags = ESDHC_FLAG_USDHC | ESDHC_FLAG_STD_TUNING
>> @@ -357,6 +363,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id imx_esdhc_dt_ids[] = {
>> { .compatible = "fsl,imx7ulp-usdhc", .data = &usdhc_imx7ulp_data, },
>> { .compatible = "fsl,imx8qxp-usdhc", .data = &usdhc_imx8qxp_data, },
>> { .compatible = "fsl,imx8mm-usdhc", .data = &usdhc_imx8mm_data, },
>> + { .compatible = "fsl,imxrt-usdhc", .data = &usdhc_imxrt_data, },
>
> I thought Rob suggested to use the SoC name, so this would be:
>
Uh i think that may have been for the UART.
> { .compatible = "fsl,imxrt1050-usdhc", .data = &usdhc_imxrt1050_data, },
>
> The same applies to the other bindings in the series.
>
> This way it would be possible to differentiate between future
> supported i.MX RT devices.
>
This makes sense will do in V3.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists