[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20211102073014.2901870-4-davidgow@google.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2021 00:30:14 -0700
From: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
To: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>,
Rae Moar <rmr167@...il.com>,
Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>, kunit-dev@...glegroups.com,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 4/4] kunit: Report test parameter results as (K)TAP subtests
Currently, the results for individial parameters in a parameterised test
are simply output as (K)TAP diagnostic lines.
As kunit_tool now supports nested subtests, report each parameter as its
own subtest.
For example, here's what the output now looks like:
# Subtest: inode_test_xtimestamp_decoding
ok 1 - 1901-12-13 Lower bound of 32bit < 0 timestamp, no extra bits
ok 2 - 1969-12-31 Upper bound of 32bit < 0 timestamp, no extra bits
ok 3 - 1970-01-01 Lower bound of 32bit >=0 timestamp, no extra bits
ok 4 - 2038-01-19 Upper bound of 32bit >=0 timestamp, no extra bits
ok 5 - 2038-01-19 Lower bound of 32bit <0 timestamp, lo extra sec bit on
ok 6 - 2106-02-07 Upper bound of 32bit <0 timestamp, lo extra sec bit on
ok 7 - 2106-02-07 Lower bound of 32bit >=0 timestamp, lo extra sec bit on
ok 8 - 2174-02-25 Upper bound of 32bit >=0 timestamp, lo extra sec bit on
ok 9 - 2174-02-25 Lower bound of 32bit <0 timestamp, hi extra sec bit on
ok 10 - 2242-03-16 Upper bound of 32bit <0 timestamp, hi extra sec bit on
ok 11 - 2242-03-16 Lower bound of 32bit >=0 timestamp, hi extra sec bit on
ok 12 - 2310-04-04 Upper bound of 32bit >=0 timestamp, hi extra sec bit on
ok 13 - 2310-04-04 Upper bound of 32bit>=0 timestamp, hi extra sec bit 1. 1 ns
ok 14 - 2378-04-22 Lower bound of 32bit>= timestamp. Extra sec bits 1. Max ns
ok 15 - 2378-04-22 Lower bound of 32bit >=0 timestamp. All extra sec bits on
ok 16 - 2446-05-10 Upper bound of 32bit >=0 timestamp. All extra sec bits on
# inode_test_xtimestamp_decoding: pass:16 fail:0 skip:0 total:16
ok 1 - inode_test_xtimestamp_decoding
Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>
---
Changes since v3:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20211028064154.2301049-4-davidgow@google.com/
- Fix the missing log line which ended up in patch 3 by mistake.
Changes since v2:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20211027013702.2039566-4-davidgow@google.com/
- No changes to this patch.
lib/kunit/test.c | 7 ++++---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/kunit/test.c b/lib/kunit/test.c
index f96498ede2cc..c7ed4aabec04 100644
--- a/lib/kunit/test.c
+++ b/lib/kunit/test.c
@@ -512,6 +512,8 @@ int kunit_run_tests(struct kunit_suite *suite)
/* Get initial param. */
param_desc[0] = '\0';
test.param_value = test_case->generate_params(NULL, param_desc);
+ kunit_log(KERN_INFO, &test, KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT
+ "# Subtest: %s", test_case->name);
while (test.param_value) {
kunit_run_case_catch_errors(suite, test_case, &test);
@@ -522,9 +524,8 @@ int kunit_run_tests(struct kunit_suite *suite)
}
kunit_log(KERN_INFO, &test,
- KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT
- "# %s: %s %d - %s",
- test_case->name,
+ KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT
+ "%s %d - %s",
kunit_status_to_ok_not_ok(test.status),
test.param_index + 1, param_desc);
--
2.33.1.1089.g2158813163f-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists