linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] kunit: tool: Do not error on tests without test plans

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAFd5g458aB5kML4TioAVF--aXwK1AiHcBi1vXVJM_cK6w8NKEg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 7 Dec 2021 15:18:32 -0500
From:   Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>
To:     David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
Cc:     Rae Moar <rmr167@...il.com>, Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>,
        Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>,
        kunit-dev@...glegroups.com, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] kunit: tool: Do not error on tests without test plans

On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 3:30 AM David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> The (K)TAP spec encourages test output to begin with a 'test plan': a
> count of the number of tests being run of the form:
> 1..n
>
> However, some test suites might not know the number of subtests in
> advance (for example, KUnit's parameterised tests use a generator
> function). In this case, it's not possible to print the test plan in
> advance.
>
> kunit_tool already parses test output which doesn't contain a plan, but
> reports an error. Since we want to use nested subtests with KUnit
> paramterised tests, remove this error.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
> Reviewed-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>

Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>