linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] kunit: tool: Report an error if any test has no subtests

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 7 Dec 2021 15:22:25 -0500
From:   Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>
To:     David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
Cc:     Rae Moar <rmr167@...il.com>, Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>,
        Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>,
        kunit-dev@...glegroups.com, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] kunit: tool: Report an error if any test has no subtests

On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 3:30 AM David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> It's possible for a test to have a subtest header, but zero valid
> subtests. We used to error on this if the test plan had no subtests
> listed, but it's possible to have subtests without a test plan (indeed,
> this is how parameterised tests work).
>
> Tests with 0 subtests now have the result NO_TESTS, and will report an
> error (which does not halt test execution, but is printed in a scary red
> colour and is noted in the results summary).
>
> Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
> Reviewed-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>

Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>