linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] kunit: Don't crash if no parameters are generated

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 7 Dec 2021 15:26:21 -0500
From:   Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>
To:     David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
Cc:     Rae Moar <rmr167@...il.com>, Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>,
        Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>,
        kunit-dev@...glegroups.com, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] kunit: Don't crash if no parameters are generated

On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 3:30 AM David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> It's possible that a parameterised test could end up with zero
> parameters. At the moment, the test function will nevertheless be called
> with NULL as the parameter. Instead, don't try to run the test code, and
> just mark the test as SKIPped.
>
> Reported-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>
> Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
> Reviewed-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>

Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>