linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mfd: stmpe: Support disabling sub-functions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YYEXj3bzOB4g1x9N@google.com>
Date:   Tue, 2 Nov 2021 10:48:47 +0000
From:   Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To:     Francesco Dolcini <francesco.dolcini@...adex.com>
Cc:     Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
        Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
        marcel.ziswiler@...adex.com,
        Oleksandr Suvorov <oleksandr.suvorov@...ndries.io>,
        linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mfd: stmpe: Support disabling sub-functions

On Tue, 02 Nov 2021, Francesco Dolcini wrote:

> On Mon, Nov 01, 2021 at 12:13:23PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Mon, 01 Nov 2021, Francesco Dolcini wrote:
> > > Hello Lee,
> > > any chance you could take this one line patch for this merge window?
> > 
> > For a patch sent 0.5 weeks before the merge-window?  Nope. :)
> 
> Hello Lee,
> no problem, I thought it was that trivial to not create any worries.
> I'll resend it in a while unless you take it before.

I like *all* patches to have a soak in -next.

You don't need to resend it.  I'll apply it in due course.

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services
Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog