[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YYFpOfovSN2Af+ux@suse.de>
Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2021 17:37:13 +0100
From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
x86@...nel.org, kexec@...ts.infradead.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
hpa@...or.com, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Cfir Cohen <cfir@...gle.com>,
Erdem Aktas <erdemaktas@...gle.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Mike Stunes <mstunes@...are.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Martin Radev <martin.b.radev@...il.com>,
Arvind Sankar <nivedita@...m.mit.edu>,
linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/12] kexec: Allow architecture code to opt-out at
runtime
On Mon, Nov 01, 2021 at 04:11:42PM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> I seem to remember the consensus when this was reviewed that it was
> unnecessary and there is already support for doing something like
> this at a more fine grained level so we don't need a new kexec hook.
It was a discussion, no consenus :)
I still think it is better to solve this in generic code for everybody
to re-use than with an hack in the architecture hooks.
More and more platforms which enable confidential computing features
may need this hook in the future.
Regards,
--
Jörg Rödel
jroedel@...e.de
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH
Maxfeldstr. 5
90409 Nürnberg
Germany
(HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg)
Geschäftsführer: Ivo Totev
Powered by blists - more mailing lists