[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YYFupTJjUljpuZgL@suse.de>
Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2021 18:00:21 +0100
From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
x86@...nel.org, kexec@...ts.infradead.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
hpa@...or.com, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Cfir Cohen <cfir@...gle.com>,
Erdem Aktas <erdemaktas@...gle.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Mike Stunes <mstunes@...are.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Martin Radev <martin.b.radev@...il.com>,
Arvind Sankar <nivedita@...m.mit.edu>,
linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/12] kexec: Allow architecture code to opt-out at
runtime
Hi again,
On Mon, Nov 01, 2021 at 04:11:42PM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> I seem to remember the consensus when this was reviewed that it was
> unnecessary and there is already support for doing something like
> this at a more fine grained level so we don't need a new kexec hook.
Forgot to state to problem again which these patches solve:
Currently a Linux kernel running as an SEV-ES guest has no way to
successfully kexec into a new kernel. The normal SIPI sequence to reset
the non-boot VCPUs does not work in SEV-ES guests and special code is
needed in Linux to safely hand over the VCPUs from one kernel to the
next. What happens currently is that the kexec'ed kernel will just hang.
The code which implements the VCPU hand-over is also included in this
patch-set, but it requires a certain level of Hypervisor support which
is not available everywhere.
To make it clear to the user that kexec will not work in their
environment, it is best to disable the respected syscalls. This is what
the hook is needed for.
Regards,
--
Jörg Rödel
jroedel@...e.de
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH
Maxfeldstr. 5
90409 Nürnberg
Germany
(HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg)
Geschäftsführer: Ivo Totev
Powered by blists - more mailing lists