linux-kernel - Re: [v5 PATCH 6/6] mm: hwpoison: handle non-anonymous THP correctly

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHbLzkrwEsTgwmaMsOFHRbM6TEvBZA965N+FJwe-ZwSzbrL-VQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 2 Nov 2021 09:41:43 -0700
From:   Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>
To:     Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc:     Jue Wang <juew@...gle.com>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
        Linux FS-devel Mailing List <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也) 
        <naoya.horiguchi@....com>, Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>,
        Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [v5 PATCH 6/6] mm: hwpoison: handle non-anonymous THP correctly

On Mon, Nov 1, 2021 at 8:50 PM Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 01, 2021 at 01:11:33PM -0700, Yang Shi wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 1, 2021 at 12:38 PM Jue Wang <juew@...gle.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > A related bug but whose fix may belong to a separate series:
> > >
> > > split_huge_page fails when invoked concurrently on the same THP page.
> > >
> > > It's possible that multiple memory errors on the same THP get consumed
> > > by multiple threads and come down to split_huge_page path easily.
> >
> > Yeah, I think it should be a known problem since the very beginning.
> > The THP split requires to pin the page and does check if the refcount
> > is expected or not and freezes the refcount if it is expected. So if
> > two concurrent paths try to split the same THP, one will fail due to
> > the pin from the other path, but the other one will succeed.
>
> No, they can both fail, if the timing is just right, because they each
> have a refcount, so neither will succeed.

Oh, yes, if there is race between unlock_page and put_page.