[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YYI8YjbE5xTSLLn4@google.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2021 07:38:10 +0000
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org, asml.silence@...il.com, axboe@...nel.dk,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
syzbot+b0003676644cf0d6acc4@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5.10.y 1/1] Revert "io_uring: reinforce cancel on flush
during exit"
On Tue, 02 Nov 2021, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 02, 2021 at 03:49:30PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> > This reverts commit 88dbd085a51ec78c83dde79ad63bca8aa4272a9d.
> >
> > Causes the following Syzkaller reported issue:
> >
> > LINK: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=b0003676644cf0d6acc4
>
> "Link:"?
Sure.
> > Reported-by: syzbot+b0003676644cf0d6acc4@...kaller.appspotmail.com
> > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
>
> Why does the patch here cause this error? Is it due to the backport
> being different than what went into Linus's tree, or something else?
The patch is the same.
I need to do some more testing, but I assume it *was* also broken in
Mainline until the whole section was rewritten. Unfortunately, the
patch which does that does not apply to v5.10.y. Again, I can look
into this, but I'm not quite sure how far the rabbit hole goes.
> The original commit did fix a real issue, what should we do now to
> resolve that issue in 5.10.y instead?
Ideally I'd like the original author and/or the domain experts to have
a look and chime in here.
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services
Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists