[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1b63798e-cf3f-5ef8-1950-3111273ad82d@nvidia.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2021 16:59:08 +0530
From: Sameer Pujar <spujar@...dia.com>
To: Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, broonie@...nel.org,
lgirdwood@...il.com, tiwai@...e.com
Cc: thierry.reding@...il.com, jonathanh@...dia.com,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Fix kcontrol put callback in Tegra drivers
On 11/3/2021 2:20 PM, Jaroslav Kysela wrote:
> External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
>
>
> On 03. 11. 21 6:04, Sameer Pujar wrote:
>> This series fixes kcontrol put callback in some of the Tegra drivers
>> which are used on platforms based on Tegra210 and later. The callback
>> is expected to return 1 whenever the HW update is done.
>
> The logic is a little bit another. The 1 means change, so you should
> compare
> the register / cached value and return 1 only when a different value
> is set.
> Your implementation invokes the change events for duplicate updates.
Sorry, I did not think the about duplicate updates. Thanks for the
suggestion.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists