[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YYJ7rIzHH754Pe1D@bombadil.infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2021 05:08:12 -0700
From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Geoff Levand <geoff@...radead.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>, Jim Paris <jim@...n.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
Nitin Gupta <ngupta@...are.org>, senozhatsky@...omium.org,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>, miquel.raynal@...tlin.com,
vigneshr@...com, Vishal L Verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>,
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
"Weiny, Ira" <ira.weiny@...el.com>,
Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
Linux NVDIMM <nvdimm@...ts.linux.dev>,
linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/13] nvdimm/blk: avoid calling del_gendisk() on early
failures
On Tue, Nov 02, 2021 at 05:49:12PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 5:10 PM Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 05:13:48PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 4:53 PM Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > If nd_integrity_init() fails we'd get del_gendisk() called,
> > > > but that's not correct as we should only call that if we're
> > > > done with device_add_disk(). Fix this by providing unwinding
> > > > prior to the devm call being registered and moving the devm
> > > > registration to the very end.
> > > >
> > > > This should fix calling del_gendisk() if nd_integrity_init()
> > > > fails. I only spotted this issue through code inspection. It
> > > > does not fix any real world bug.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Just fyi, I'm preparing patches to delete this driver completely as it
> > > is unused by any shipping platform. I hope to get that removal into
> > > v5.16.
> >
> > Curious if are you going to nuking it on v5.16? Otherwise it would stand
> > in the way of the last few patches to add __must_check for the final
> > add_disk() error handling changes.
>
> True, I don't think I can get it nuked in time, so you can add my
> Reviewed-by for this one.
This patch required the previous patch in this series to also be
applied. Can I apply your Reviewed-by there too?
Luis
Powered by blists - more mailing lists