[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACO55tsq6DOZnyCZrg+N3m_hseJfN_6+YhjDyxVBAGq9PFJmGA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2021 21:29:29 +0100
From: Karol Herbst <kherbst@...hat.com>
To: Sven Joachim <svenjoac@....de>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Erhard F." <erhard_f@...lbox.org>,
nouveau <nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, stable@...r.kernel.org,
Huang Rui <ray.huang@....com>,
Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>
Subject: Re: [Nouveau] [PATCH 5.10 32/77] drm/ttm: fix memleak in ttm_transfered_destroy
On Wed, Nov 3, 2021 at 8:52 PM Sven Joachim <svenjoac@....de> wrote:
>
> On 2021-11-01 10:17 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>
> > From: Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>
> >
> > commit 0db55f9a1bafbe3dac750ea669de9134922389b5 upstream.
> >
> > We need to cleanup the fences for ghost objects as well.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>
> > Reported-by: Erhard F. <erhard_f@...lbox.org>
> > Tested-by: Erhard F. <erhard_f@...lbox.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Huang Rui <ray.huang@....com>
> > Bug: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=214029
> > Bug: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=214447
> > CC: <stable@...r.kernel.org>
> > Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211020173211.2247-1-christian.koenig@amd.com
> > Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_util.c | 1 +
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_util.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_util.c
> > @@ -322,6 +322,7 @@ static void ttm_transfered_destroy(struc
> > struct ttm_transfer_obj *fbo;
> >
> > fbo = container_of(bo, struct ttm_transfer_obj, base);
> > + dma_resv_fini(&fbo->base.base._resv);
> > ttm_bo_put(fbo->bo);
> > kfree(fbo);
> > }
>
> Alas, this innocuous looking commit causes one of my systems to lock up
> as soon as run startx. This happens with the nouveau driver, two other
> systems with radeon and intel graphics are not affected. Also I only
> noticed it in 5.10.77. Kernels 5.15 and 5.14.16 are not affected, and I
> do not use 5.4 anymore.
>
> I am not familiar with nouveau's ttm management and what has changed
> there between 5.10 and 5.14, but maybe one of their developers can shed
> a light on this.
>
> Cheers,
> Sven
>
could be related to 265ec0dd1a0d18f4114f62c0d4a794bb4e729bc1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists