[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20211104114540.30622-1-yao.jing2@zte.com.cn>
Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2021 11:45:40 +0000
From: cgel.zte@...il.com
To: johan@...nel.org
Cc: cgel.zte@...il.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, yao.jing2@....com.cn,
zealci@....com.cn
Subject: [PATCH v2] most: replace snprintf in show functions with sysfs_emit
From: Jing Yao <yao.jing2@....com.cn>
coccicheck complains about the use of snprintf() in sysfs show
functions:
WARNING use scnprintf or sprintf
Use sysfs_emit instead of scnprintf, snprintf or sprintf makes more
sense.
Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@....com.cn>
Signed-off-by: Jing Yao <yao.jing2@....com.cn>
---
Changes since v1:
- Actually, the robot which is composed of lots of tools includes
coccienlle.
- Change the ignored snprintf().
- Change the wrong Subject.
drivers/most/most_usb.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/most/most_usb.c b/drivers/most/most_usb.c
index acabb7715b42..73258b24fea7 100644
--- a/drivers/most/most_usb.c
+++ b/drivers/most/most_usb.c
@@ -831,7 +831,7 @@ static ssize_t value_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
int err;
if (sysfs_streq(name, "arb_address"))
- return snprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "%04x\n", dci_obj->reg_addr);
+ return sysfs_emit(buf, "%04x\n", dci_obj->reg_addr);
if (sysfs_streq(name, "arb_value"))
reg_addr = dci_obj->reg_addr;
@@ -843,7 +843,7 @@ static ssize_t value_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
if (err < 0)
return err;
- return snprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "%04x\n", val);
+ return sysfs_emit(buf, "%04x\n", val);
}
static ssize_t value_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists