linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] most: replace snprintf in show functions with sysfs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YYjy3QRXk/VL2Lze@hovoldconsulting.com>
Date:   Mon, 8 Nov 2021 10:50:21 +0100
From:   Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
To:     cgel.zte@...il.com
Cc:     gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        yao.jing2@....com.cn, zealci@....com.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] most: replace snprintf in show functions with
 sysfs_emit

On Thu, Nov 04, 2021 at 11:45:40AM +0000, cgel.zte@...il.com wrote:
> From: Jing Yao <yao.jing2@....com.cn>
> 
> coccicheck complains about the use of snprintf() in sysfs show
> functions:
> WARNING use scnprintf or sprintf
> 
> Use sysfs_emit instead of scnprintf, snprintf or sprintf makes more
> sense.
> 
> Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@....com.cn>
> Signed-off-by: Jing Yao <yao.jing2@....com.cn>
> ---
> 
> Changes since v1:
>  - Actually, the robot which is composed of lots of tools includes
>    coccienlle.
>  - Change the ignored snprintf().
>  - Change the wrong Subject.

Ok, this is much better, but note that there are a lot more instances
like this in the "most" subsystem which this patch is not addressing so
the patch prefix should really have been:

	"most: usb: ..."

since you're only handling the most usb driver.

>  drivers/most/most_usb.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/most/most_usb.c b/drivers/most/most_usb.c
> index acabb7715b42..73258b24fea7 100644
> --- a/drivers/most/most_usb.c
> +++ b/drivers/most/most_usb.c
> @@ -831,7 +831,7 @@ static ssize_t value_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
>  	int err;
>  
>  	if (sysfs_streq(name, "arb_address"))
> -		return snprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "%04x\n", dci_obj->reg_addr);
> +		return sysfs_emit(buf, "%04x\n", dci_obj->reg_addr);
>  
>  	if (sysfs_streq(name, "arb_value"))
>  		reg_addr = dci_obj->reg_addr;
> @@ -843,7 +843,7 @@ static ssize_t value_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
>  	if (err < 0)
>  		return err;
>  
> -	return snprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "%04x\n", val);
> +	return sysfs_emit(buf, "%04x\n", val);
>  }
>  
>  static ssize_t value_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,

Other than that, looks good:

Reviewed-by: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>

Johan