lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bb676730-a1b1-3bbe-116e-7d20ab6e8a58@linux.ibm.com>
Date:   Fri, 5 Nov 2021 09:23:53 +0100
From:   Harald Freudenberger <freude@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@...ux.ibm.com>, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     jjherne@...ux.ibm.com, borntraeger@...ibm.com, cohuck@...hat.com,
        mjrosato@...ux.ibm.com, pasic@...ux.ibm.com,
        alex.williamson@...hat.com, kwankhede@...dia.com,
        fiuczy@...ux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v17 14/15] s390/ap: notify drivers on config changed and
 scan complete callbacks

On 04.11.21 16:50, Tony Krowiak wrote:
>
>
> On 11/4/21 8:06 AM, Harald Freudenberger wrote:
>>
>> Tony as this is v17, if you may do jet another loop, I would pick the ap parts of your patch series and
>> apply them to the devel branch as separate patches.
>
> Are you suggesting I do this now, or when this is finally ready to go upstream?
>
>
I am suggesting picking all the ap related stuff into one patch and commit it to the devel branch now (well in the next days).
So the ap stuff is then prepared for your patches and it gives your patch series some relief.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ