lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 5 Nov 2021 14:15:08 +0100
From:   Harald Freudenberger <freude@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@...ux.ibm.com>, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     jjherne@...ux.ibm.com, borntraeger@...ibm.com, cohuck@...hat.com,
        mjrosato@...ux.ibm.com, pasic@...ux.ibm.com,
        alex.williamson@...hat.com, kwankhede@...dia.com,
        fiuczy@...ux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v17 14/15] s390/ap: notify drivers on config changed and
 scan complete callbacks

On 05.11.21 09:23, Harald Freudenberger wrote:
> On 04.11.21 16:50, Tony Krowiak wrote:
>>
>> On 11/4/21 8:06 AM, Harald Freudenberger wrote:
>>> Tony as this is v17, if you may do jet another loop, I would pick the ap parts of your patch series and
>>> apply them to the devel branch as separate patches.
>> Are you suggesting I do this now, or when this is finally ready to go upstream?
>>
>>
> I am suggesting picking all the ap related stuff into one patch and commit it to the devel branch now (well in the next days).
> So the ap stuff is then prepared for your patches and it gives your patch series some relief.
Of course I would do this if you agree to this procedure.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ