[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YYWmZMc8eVq5SZYj@kunai>
Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2021 22:47:16 +0100
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>
To: Horatiu Vultur - M31836 <Horatiu.Vultur@...rochip.com>
Cc: Codrin Ciubotariu - M19940 <Codrin.Ciubotariu@...rochip.com>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Nicolas Ferre - M43238 <Nicolas.Ferre@...rochip.com>,
"alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com" <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
Ludovic Desroches - M43218 <Ludovic.Desroches@...rochip.com>,
"linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org" <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] i2c: at91: Add support for programmable clock source
> I think actually I will drop this patch series because apparently
> lan966x works fine also with the peripheral clock. So then no changes
> are required.
Not even patch 1/2?
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists