linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] i2c: at91: Add support for programmable clock source

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 8 Nov 2021 08:35:29 +0000
From:   <Codrin.Ciubotariu@...rochip.com>
To:     <wsa@...nel.org>, <Horatiu.Vultur@...rochip.com>,
        <robh+dt@...nel.org>, <Nicolas.Ferre@...rochip.com>,
        <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>, <Ludovic.Desroches@...rochip.com>,
        <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] i2c: at91: Add support for programmable clock source

On 05.11.2021 23:47, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> 
>> I think actually I will drop this patch series because apparently
>> lan966x works fine also with the peripheral clock. So then no changes
>> are required.
> 
> Not even patch 1/2?
> 

we can keep the new compatible, but patch 2/2 needs to be split.

Best regards,
Codrin