[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <eb2120c3-540e-64db-8b70-c2b29f23e3cc@microchip.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2021 08:35:29 +0000
From: <Codrin.Ciubotariu@...rochip.com>
To: <wsa@...nel.org>, <Horatiu.Vultur@...rochip.com>,
<robh+dt@...nel.org>, <Nicolas.Ferre@...rochip.com>,
<alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>, <Ludovic.Desroches@...rochip.com>,
<linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] i2c: at91: Add support for programmable clock source
On 05.11.2021 23:47, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>
>> I think actually I will drop this patch series because apparently
>> lan966x works fine also with the peripheral clock. So then no changes
>> are required.
>
> Not even patch 1/2?
>
we can keep the new compatible, but patch 2/2 needs to be split.
Best regards,
Codrin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists