[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211108092942.uulvtqoi36wnbisg@soft-dev3-1.localhost>
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2021 10:29:42 +0100
From: Horatiu Vultur - M31836 <Horatiu.Vultur@...rochip.com>
To: Codrin Ciubotariu - M19940 <Codrin.Ciubotariu@...rochip.com>
CC: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Nicolas Ferre - M43238 <Nicolas.Ferre@...rochip.com>,
"alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com" <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
"Ludovic Desroches - M43218" <Ludovic.Desroches@...rochip.com>,
"linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org" <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] i2c: at91: Add support for programmable clock source
The 11/08/2021 08:35, Codrin Ciubotariu - M19940 wrote:
> On 05.11.2021 23:47, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> >
> >> I think actually I will drop this patch series because apparently
> >> lan966x works fine also with the peripheral clock. So then no changes
> >> are required.
> >
> > Not even patch 1/2?
> >
>
> we can keep the new compatible, but patch 2/2 needs to be split.
For me it is OK to use the compatible string 'microchip,sam9x60-i2c'
>
> Best regards,
> Codrin
--
/Horatiu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists