[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YaSmOgH9MP0Kag0s@kunai>
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2021 11:06:50 +0100
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>
To: Horatiu Vultur - M31836 <Horatiu.Vultur@...rochip.com>
Cc: Codrin Ciubotariu - M19940 <Codrin.Ciubotariu@...rochip.com>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Nicolas Ferre - M43238 <Nicolas.Ferre@...rochip.com>,
"alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com" <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
Ludovic Desroches - M43218 <Ludovic.Desroches@...rochip.com>,
"linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org" <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] i2c: at91: Add support for programmable clock source
> > > Not even patch 1/2?
> >
> > we can keep the new compatible, but patch 2/2 needs to be split.
>
> For me it is OK to use the compatible string 'microchip,sam9x60-i2c'
I'll drop this patch for now. If anyone is still interested in it,
please resend.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists