[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YYbYXT5O2KTxLAKC@kernel.org>
Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2021 16:32:45 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@...ux.ibm.com>,
Thomas Richter <tmricht@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
sumanthk@...ux.ibm.com, jolsa@...hat.com, svens@...ux.ibm.com,
gor@...ux.ibm.com, hca@...ux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf/test: Test case 27 broken on s390 in linux-next
Em Wed, Nov 03, 2021 at 04:52:15PM +0100, Thomas Richter escreveu:
> Commit 10269a2ca2b08c ("perf test sample-parsing: Add endian test for struct branch_flags")
> broke the test case 27 (Sample parsing) on s390 on linux-next tree:
Maddy,
Can you please ack this one?
- Arnaldo
> # ./perf test -Fv 27
> 27: Sample parsing
> --- start ---
> parsing failed for sample_type 0x800
> ---- end ----
> Sample parsing: FAILED!
> #
>
> The cause of the failure is a wrong #define BS_EXPECTED_BE statement
> in above commit. Correct this define and the test case runs fine.
>
> Output After:
> # ./perf test -Fv 27
> 27: Sample parsing :
> --- start ---
> ---- end ----
> Sample parsing: Ok
> #
>
> Fixes: 10269a2ca2b08c ("perf test sample-parsing: Add endian test for struct branch_flags")
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Richter <tmricht@...ux.ibm.com>
> ---
> tools/perf/tests/sample-parsing.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/sample-parsing.c b/tools/perf/tests/sample-parsing.c
> index c83a11514129..9c7af55b74db 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/tests/sample-parsing.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/tests/sample-parsing.c
> @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@
> * These are based on the input value (213) specified
> * in branch_stack variable.
> */
> -#define BS_EXPECTED_BE 0xa00d000000000000
> +#define BS_EXPECTED_BE 0xa000d00000000000
> #define BS_EXPECTED_LE 0xd5000000
> #define FLAG(s) s->branch_stack->entries[i].flags
>
> --
> 2.25.1
--
- Arnaldo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists