[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YYpOPs+/RuUq+ld8@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2021 12:32:30 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 7/8] gpiolib: remove gpio_to_chip
On Tue, Nov 09, 2021 at 11:02:06AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
>
> There are only two callers of this helper, remove them by
> open-coding the call to the gpiod version.
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> ---
> drivers/pinctrl/core.c | 5 ++---
> drivers/soc/fsl/qe/gpio.c | 4 +---
> include/linux/gpio.h | 7 -------
> 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/core.c b/drivers/pinctrl/core.c
> index 976607758e98..8d3c00782178 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/core.c
> @@ -28,7 +28,6 @@
> #ifdef CONFIG_GPIOLIB
I'm wondering if we need this ifdeffery at all.
> #include "../gpio/gpiolib.h"
> -#include <linux/gpio.h>
> #endif
>
> #include "core.h"
> @@ -324,7 +323,7 @@ static bool pinctrl_ready_for_gpio_range(unsigned gpio)
> {
> struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev;
> struct pinctrl_gpio_range *range = NULL;
> - struct gpio_chip *chip = gpio_to_chip(gpio);
> + struct gpio_chip *chip = gpiod_to_chip(gpio_to_desc(gpio));
>
> if (WARN(!chip, "no gpio_chip for gpio%i?", gpio))
> return false;
> @@ -1657,7 +1656,7 @@ static int pinctrl_pins_show(struct seq_file *s, void *what)
> }
> }
> if (gpio_num >= 0)
> - chip = gpio_to_chip(gpio_num);
> + chip = gpiod_to_chip(gpio_to_desc(gpio_num));
> else
> chip = NULL;
> if (chip)
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/fsl/qe/gpio.c b/drivers/soc/fsl/qe/gpio.c
> index 99f7de43c3c6..a6aa55055e9a 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/fsl/qe/gpio.c
> +++ b/drivers/soc/fsl/qe/gpio.c
> @@ -15,8 +15,6 @@
> #include <linux/of.h>
> #include <linux/of_gpio.h>
> #include <linux/gpio/driver.h>
> -/* FIXME: needed for gpio_to_chip() get rid of this */
> -#include <linux/gpio.h>
> #include <linux/slab.h>
> #include <linux/export.h>
> #include <soc/fsl/qe/qe.h>
> @@ -173,7 +171,7 @@ struct qe_pin *qe_pin_request(struct device_node *np, int index)
> err = of_get_gpio(np, index);
> if (err < 0)
> goto err0;
> - gc = gpio_to_chip(err);
> + gc = gpiod_to_chip(gpio_to_desc(err));
> if (WARN_ON(!gc)) {
> err = -ENODEV;
> goto err0;
> diff --git a/include/linux/gpio.h b/include/linux/gpio.h
> index 7ceb93678689..61fb427b4e70 100644
> --- a/include/linux/gpio.h
> +++ b/include/linux/gpio.h
> @@ -96,12 +96,6 @@ static inline bool gpio_is_valid(int number)
>
> struct device;
>
> -/* caller holds gpio_lock *OR* gpio is marked as requested */
> -static inline struct gpio_chip *gpio_to_chip(unsigned gpio)
> -{
> - return gpiod_to_chip(gpio_to_desc(gpio));
> -}
> -
> /* Always use the library code for GPIO management calls,
> * or when sleeping may be involved.
> */
> @@ -158,7 +152,6 @@ int devm_gpio_request_one(struct device *dev, unsigned gpio,
> #include <linux/bug.h>
>
> struct device;
> -struct gpio_chip;
>
> static inline bool gpio_is_valid(int number)
> {
> --
> 2.29.2
>
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists