linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 09/11] dt-bindings: i2c: i2c-imx-lpi2c: Fix dtbs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YYwFy+aVrYEDls4x@ryzen>
Date:   Wed, 10 Nov 2021 19:47:55 +0200
From:   Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@....com>
To:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc:     Dong Aisheng <aisheng.dong@....com>,
        Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
        Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
        Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
        linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
        NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 09/11] dt-bindings: i2c: i2c-imx-lpi2c: Fix dtbs_check
 compatible oneOf error

On 21-11-10 17:52:19, Abel Vesa wrote:
> On 21-10-14 15:02:19, Rob Herring wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 06, 2021 at 04:26:02PM +0300, Abel Vesa wrote:
> > > Fix following dtbs_check error:
> > > 
> > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8qm-mek.dt.yaml:
> > > i2c@...00000: compatible: 'oneOf' conditional failed, one must be fixed:
> > >         ['fsl,imx8qm-lpi2c', 'fsl,imx7ulp-lpi2c'] is too long
> > >         Additional items are not allowed ('fsl,imx7ulp-lpi2c' was
> > > unexpected)
> > >         'fsl,imx8qxp-lpi2c' was expected
> > >         From schema:
> > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-imx-lpi2c.yaml
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@....com>
> > > ---
> > >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-imx-lpi2c.yaml | 5 ++++-
> > >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-imx-lpi2c.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-imx-lpi2c.yaml
> > > index 29b9447f3b84..acf2d5f45f4e 100644
> > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-imx-lpi2c.yaml
> > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-imx-lpi2c.yaml
> > > @@ -18,8 +18,11 @@ properties:
> > >        - enum:
> > >            - fsl,imx7ulp-lpi2c
> > >            - fsl,imx8qm-lpi2c
> > > +          - fsl,imx8qxp-lpi2c
> > 
> > Both with and without a fallback should not be valid.
> > 
> > Why are you changing fsl,imx8qxp-lpi2c when the error was for 
> > fsl,imx8qm-lpi2c?
> > 
> 
> Sorry for the late reply.
> 
> I assume the correct way would be like:
> 
>     oneOf:                                   
>       - enum:                                
>           - fsl,imx7ulp-lpi2c                
>       - items:                               
> 	  - enum:                            
> 	      - fsl,imx8dxl-lpi2c            
> 	      - fsl,imx8qxp-lpi2c            
> 	      - fsl,imx8qm-lpi2c             
> 	  - const: fsl,imx7ulp-lpi2c         
> 				
> Right ?
> 
> Since all the possible combinations are:
> 	compatible = "fsl,imx8dxl-lpi2c", "fsl,imx7ulp-lpi2c";
> 	compatible = "fsl,imx8qm-lpi2c", "fsl,imx7ulp-lpi2c";
> 	compatible = "fsl,imx8qxp-lpi2c", "fsl,imx7ulp-lpi2c";
> 	compatible = "fsl,imx7ulp-lpi2c";
> 

Sent v4. Please have a look there.

> 
> > >        - items:
> > > -          - const: fsl,imx8qxp-lpi2c
> > > +          - enum:
> > > +              - fsl,imx8qm-lpi2c
> > > +              - fsl,imx8qxp-lpi2c
> > >            - const: fsl,imx7ulp-lpi2c
> > >  
> > >    reg:
> > > -- 
> > > 2.31.1
> > > 
> > >