[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211110184525.GM2001@kadam>
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2021 21:45:25 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: Saurav Girepunje <saurav.girepunje@...il.com>
Cc: Larry.Finger@...inger.net, phil@...lpotter.co.uk,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, straube.linux@...il.com,
martin@...ser.cx, linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, saurav.girepunje@...mail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: r8188eu: core: remove goto statement
On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 11:47:15PM +0530, Saurav Girepunje wrote:
> Remove the goto statement from _rtw_init_recv_priv(). In this function goto
> can be replace by return statement. As on goto label exit, function
> only return it is not performing any cleanup. Avoiding goto will
> improve the function readability.
>
> Signed-off-by: Saurav Girepunje <saurav.girepunje@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_recv.c | 7 ++-----
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_recv.c b/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_recv.c
> index 51a13262a226..b38af76f3a67 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_recv.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_recv.c
> @@ -58,10 +58,8 @@ int _rtw_init_recv_priv(struct recv_priv *precvpriv, struct adapter *padapter)
>
> precvpriv->pallocated_frame_buf = vzalloc(NR_RECVFRAME * sizeof(struct recv_frame) + RXFRAME_ALIGN_SZ);
>
> - if (!precvpriv->pallocated_frame_buf) {
> - res = _FAIL;
> - goto exit;
> - }
> + if (!precvpriv->pallocated_frame_buf)
> + return _FAIL;
I hate pointless "goto exit;" labels, but there isn't a rule against
them and I feel like this is not a good enough patch on its own. There
is so much other stuff wrong with this function. It probably *should*
have some error handling for example.
I don't think this patch really adds enough value. Take a look at the
function and almost every line can be improved...
regards,
dan carpenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists